Stop making our Postal Rail a tourist attraction and get back to it carrying mail!

The Royal Mail infrastructure of tunnels that connect Whitechapel with Mount Pleasant Postal Sorting Office and Paddington Station and which was closed in 2003 will scandalously reopen in September 2017 as a Postal Museum tourist attraction called “Mail Ride” (see here).

The network built by the tax payers purse,  which was in operation between 1927 and 2003, was claimed in 2003 to be too expensive to be continued to operate and repair. They claimed it was five times more costly than transportation by trucks on roads. The Communications Union claimed, however, the costs were hyped up.  Royal Mail then moved much of the post that went through the tunnels onto road based trucks which increased traffic on roads throughout the city.  A Greater London Authority (GLA) Study in 2013 noticed that this increase was equivalent to an extra 80 lorry journies per week on London roads, with a not insignificant environmental impact (particle and noise pollution)  See The Future of Rail Mail, GLA, April 2013.

At the time of the closure, Royal Mail faced losses of nearly 1/2 bn Pounds (£484 Mio), which let in the end to its total sale by the Conservative government in 2015.

The closure of the Postal Rail was criticized not only by the Communication Workers Union (CWU) but also by the GLA. The GLA opposed the closure, especially on the aforementioned environmental grounds.  They recommended that steps should be undertaken to make the line made efficient again. Further, there was criticism by Steve Jones of the CWU that the line had been deliberately run down by Royal Mail and that  “We think we could very, very quickly move to a break even. If you start bringing new work into the business, you could probably make a profit.”

A secret investigation by a group calling itself the Consolidation Crew revealed in 2011 that the tracks and tunnels were all in relatively good shape. Whilst their exploration was from an urban sociological perspective it suggested that the network could easily be reopened if there was any will. See http://www.placehacking.co.uk/2011/04/24/security-breach-london-mail-rail/

In spite of intense discussions about the congestion on London roads and the pollution it caused, Royal Mail, now a private company, never felt it would be right to consider using the tunnel network and getting lorries off the road.

Instead, in an almost cynical move, part of the tunnels are now going to be used for museum tours,  costing £14.50 or £16.50 with a donation to normal paying adults, where visitors can have a ride on purpose built trains along the old tracks. UK national media like the BBC and the Guardian have been invited for pre-opening tours, but their reports lacked any critique of the controversial history of the closure, focusing on but what the Postal Museum wanted to get out, here is a history themed “fun ride” ( See BBC Report and  Guardian Report).

The Kings Cross Community, which is part of the London population that had to tolerate the increase of 80 Royal Mail lorries per week on already overloaded and congested roads, has always seen Royal Mail traffic through its roads as a problem. We have seen little signs of willingness or cooperation to change traffic from the Mount Pleasant Central sorting office to less polluting vehicles or electric vehicles or to offer any solutions to mitigate the environmental impact of their road based transport. They like to stay quiet and out of the discussions on this. Yet one partial solution was and continues to be right underneath the renovated post office.

It is rather hypocritical to state that the tunnels are not able to carry mail any longer, but are good enough for human transport, in fact, that a purpose built locomotive and compartments that can carry people were ordered for the purpose, and that Royal Mail believes that it can advertise these rides, which can be pre-booked now for its opening in September 2017, without controversy or argument.  One poster doing so was seen at Kings Cross Underground station itself, an offence to all tube using local residents of Kings Cross, when you consider that our mail could also take the tube, rather than the truck.

It is a scandal that it took this community blog to highlight the controversy and hypocrisy of the scheme and expose it for what it is: A shallow money making enterprise on the backing of a proud and futuristic scheme erected by the public purse by gone by generations for the greater good. In fact, it is a scheme way ahead of its time, and in the climate of trying to reduce congestion and polluting traffic it ought to be considered to be more than just the latest London tourist attraction to yield money from rides, but its operation restarted and in fact, the track network extended.

 

 

 

About Daniel Zylbersztajn

Daniel Zylbersztajn, is since 2012 correspondent to the German independent left of centre daily newspaper taz, die Tageszeitung and Jüdische Allgemeine, and a Pilates Teacher. Born in Germany but also raised in Holland and Israel, he is a long term resident of London Kings Cross (first in 1991), involved parent, local and social activist, and positive lifestyle advocate. He also held posts in research, and conflict work, a.o. for the Palestinian - Israeli peace village Wahat al Salam ~ Neve Shalom. He holds a BA in history and politics from SOAS and two Master degrees, in Urban Sociology (Goldsmiths) and Sports Coaching (Brunel). He is founding and committee member of Coram's Fields User Group, the parent and community voice of Central London's biggest and oldest children playground and was its first spokesperson and chair. Daniel tweets under @zylbersztajn
This entry was posted in Bad Gyrations KX Campaign, New, Noise, railwayslands, Transport and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Stop making our Postal Rail a tourist attraction and get back to it carrying mail!

  1. Pingback: August 2017 – Postal News – Postal Employee Network

  2. Albert Beale says:

    From: Albert Beale, 5 Caledonian Road

    Daniel – well done for this!

    At the time the Post Office Railway was closed, it was said not to be only a matter of total cost, but a function of the subdivision of the old Post Office / Royal Mail into separate trading subsidiaries, when they first talked of privatising it all, many years ago. I was told that the problem was a squabble between Royal Mail, the letters department, and Parcel Force, the parcels bit, as to how the cost of upgrading those tunnels would be split, given that they were now rival “profit centres” rather than part of an integrated public service. So because they couldn’t agree, it was closed.

    Of course this went along with the larger scale (ie nationwide rather than just London) switch from rail to road, brought about by the commercialisation of the rail system. Long-distance movement of mail went by train – including by some dedicated overnight services where First Class stuff was cross-sorted en route … remember the famous film (The Night Mail – the successors of which continued for decades until the switch from rail relatively recently).

    The reinstatement of the PO Railway, putting it back into use, of course makes environmental sense, especially if more of it continues its journey by national rail (many of the stations on the little London system are directly underneath stations; others are underneath sorting offices).

    As part of an integrated low-impact delivery and distribution system in London (think of smaller localised deliveries rather than vast lorries bringing stuff into the centre) – for things beyond just the post – these tunnels could be invaluable. It would be said to be too expensive to build this system from scratch (though imagine how people would think it a brilliant idea if it didn’t already exist and someone proposed it now!); but it’s sitting there, mostly (apart from the twee heritage bit being advertised now) just mothballed, and could be reclaimed for use – if the political will was there and shareholder profit wasn’t the controlling factor in decision-making..

    It’s certainly an environmental scandal that an existing capital resource like this isn’t still in use.

    Albert Beale

    • Dear Albert, thank you for the further invaluable information and the larger picture as it was then, especially your memories on the competing parts of the old RM, inrcedible! Thank you so much for sharing this!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s