Height restriction policy win for campaigners on town hall annexe site

Early morning snow

As tall buildings spring up in the King’s Cross development, and work begins on Camden’s new town hall there, it is worth turning some attention back to plans for the site next to the existing town hall.

Local group, Friends of Argyle Square have been leading a campaign to restrict the height of any new building to not exceed the current nine-storey 1970s “eggbox”. This has involved getting stuck into an impenetrable but important document called the Site allocations development plan, which had set height restrictions (among other things) for several sites in Camden, but not for this most sensitive of spots, opposite St Pancras station.

The group made submissions to a government-appointed inspector at a series of examination hearings earlier this year. As a result of their efforts, Camden council has now added the key phrase:

“In view of these constraints and considerations a tall building is likely to be unacceptable in this location.”

(See page five of this download).

To seal the deal on this and other changes in the document, it must once again go out for public consultation. Thanks must go to everyone that commented on this document last year, but you are encouraged to reinforce your views again so that they can be finally taken into account and form planning policy.

Could the stipulations be tighter, has there been anything missed? Has “tall building” been adequately defined? Make yourself heard by Friday 26 April. View the background papers and details for commenting.

The campaigners were concerned from discussions at the hearings that the council is vague about what constitutes a tall building and would not rule out considering a 16-storey building for the site. They want the words “no taller than the current building” in the amendments.

Credit is due to FoAS for their forensic persistence. They have themselves expressed their gratitude to charity Planning Aid for London and have also been supported by the St Pancras Chambers Residents Association.

In the end, whatever is built on the town hall annexe site must respect the cluster of grand listed buildings which include St Pancras and King’s Cross, as well as the soon to be reopened Great Northern Hotel.

Related articles on this site
Camden Town Hall extension development – another tall building?
Keep it lowdown on the south side
Small window to oppose a skyscraper next to the town hall

About Clare Hill

Clare is a writer and editor who lived in King’s Cross for a decade. She is passionate about local history, transport and food. Contact Clare by commenting on her posts or go to http://www.clarehill.net
This entry was posted in Architecture, Planning, Licensing and Regulation and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s